Looks like someone took an initiative... somewhat.

[Dajistano]

http://ecommerce.spawn.com/index.asp...ROD&ProdID=161


IMPORTANT
If we catch you attempting to order more than the limit during the 7/2-7/6 period, we will cancel ALL your orders

[Drau]

Hmm, interesting that they will be offering the whole series in the store.

[Dion Bozman]

That policy has been in effect for the last 6-7 months.
dion

[-megalithanod]

Yep - nothing new.

They have been saying that for ages.

[Slytherin Snape]

Actually, I thought that it was somewhat of a change. The prior policy just cancelled the "extra/duplicate" orders, but not all orders. At least that's certainly the way they made it sound.

Otherwise, when they made this "new" announcement what's the big deal about stressing/specifying they will cancel ALL orders if they've been doing it that way all along?

Not that it really matters to the people on this board (we're not law breakers [img]wink.gif[/img] ), but I do think previously they didn't cancel all orders, just the "duplicates".

Anyhoo.... [img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img]

[-megalithanod]

In the last couple of go arounds, they have been cancelling all of them if someone tried to break the rules - especially since the time they switched over to the off site hosting of the ecommerce server system.

Doesn't matter though - we are all the "good" customers [img]smile.gif[/img]

[Slytherin Snape]

[img]graemlins/hmmm.gif[/img] Just seemed like before they only made reference to going through and cancelling "duplicate" orders and now they are hard core and specifically stressing ALL orders will be cancelled - like they are trying to "step up" the penalty for trying to cheat. Not only will you not get the "duplicates", but now you won't get any.

Perhaps they have been doing it that way all along, but the wording of the warning has specifically been changed this time from saying duplicate orders will be cancelled to saying all orders will be cancelled. Just the lawyer in me picking at the semantics of the wording. [img]tongue.gif[/img]

Which is neither here nor there...... Nomalas and I are still fighting the "one per household" rule (as opposed to per person) and will probably be doing so to the bitter end. It's a matter of principle! [img]wink.gif[/img]

[316what]

I'm also joining Snape and Nomalas in their fight. Not as vocal as the two of them, but I did raise the question and chime in from time to time.

[-megalithanod]

I do feel for you on that issue Snape (and Nomalas).

The problem with me is looking at both sides of the issue - I both agree and disagree with both sides on facilitation of the issue.

Unfortunately I haven't come up with a solution in my head that would allow people like you and Nomalas to obtain the pieces you need, while ensuring that others who are trying to purchase the limit for sheer profit, don't.

Once I come up with something, I'll definately chime in with my opinions. I just feel that since I haven't formulated one completely yet (story of my life), I shouldn't join the fray.

[Biomechanoid]

I just wish they'd go back to the mail flyers already... [img]confused.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/cry.gif[/img] [img]wink.gif[/img] [img]tongue.gif[/img]